I was watching Blade Runner last night, for the first time in a number of years, and when I read the opening introduction text I felt a pang of regret when it placed the age of bellowing flames and unbreathable skies in 2019, in L.A. I regret it because it dates the film badly. It would have been so much better to never mention the date. A couple of changes in the script where 2017 could have been said "two years ago", and the story would have been much the better. It's a flaw in a vision of a dark future that still has things to say about genetic engineering.
I can understand the problem. I've made the mistake myself, several times. For example, in a Parking Spaces a short story published in the September 1985 issue of Analog, and maybe written a year earlier, I put 1988 as the date where engine control computers in cars developed a rudimentary intelligence. It was okay for a 1985 story that was quickly forgotten, but with just a little re-writing and put in Toyotas rather than Fords, it could find a whole new life.
Those early mistakes must have made an impression on me, because I made efforts to avoid explicit dates in nearly everything I write now. Just like movies use 555 phone numbers, nailing down a fixed point in time has consequences. Write for an age, not for a moment.
Tales of the U'tanse: Mercy Run - Part 10 of 22
-
© 2011 by Henry Melton
They walked the halls, heading so far into the mountain that it was all
new. James had never realized the tunnels continued this f...
19 hours ago

0 comments:
Post a Comment